OPEN ACCESS plSSN : 0374-8111 | elSSN : 2287-8815
OPEN ACCESS plSSN : 0374-8111elSSN : 2287-8815
HOME Article Archive Search for Archives
SEARCH FOR ARTICLE
kfas, vol. 57, no. 4, pp.410-422, August, 2024 DOI. https://doi.org/10.5657/KFAS.2024.0410

Sustainable Fishery Certification Scheme and Fishery Improvement Projects

김장근·이재봉1·박두현2·박정호3·박희원3·임정현3·권유정3*
지속가능어업자문연구센타, 1국립수산과학원 서해수산연구소, 2오션아웃컴즈 한국어업개선관리자, 3국립수산과학원 원양자원과

  • ABSTRACT

    Despite international laws and government efforts, most of the world’s fishery resources and ecosystems have continued to decline since the 1970s. In response, international non-governmental organizations have launched sustainable seafood movements and attempted various strategic approaches. These include the “boycott” strategy of the 1980s and 1990s, and the expansion of certified fisheries through Fishery Improvement Projects (FIPs) in the 2000s. According to data from the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC), currently there are 274 MSC-certified fisheries in 63 countries, covering 179 species, and 264 fisheries engaged in FIPs in 67 countries, covering 233 species. In Korea, the adoption of private fishery governance, which complements international and domestic fishery laws and government management, remains relatively low. Therefore, we examined private fishery governance with respect to its governance, interaction with laws, credibility, legitimacy, current status, and key considerations for its implementation. We emphasize the utilizing MSC fishery certification schemes as an audit approach to sustainability, implementating FIPs to address the fisheries sustainability gap, using councils for leadership, and securing government financing for fisheries with no market incentives.

  • Keyword

    MSC, FIP, Distant water fisheries, Sustainable seafood movement, Audit